Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1354

reference
979-tree-1
name
1354
tree-preservation-order

undefined

979-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.009261 50.852925)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.009176 50.852916,-1.009180 50.852933,-1.009192 50.852948,-1.009210 50.852960,-1.009234 50.852968,-1.009260 50.852971,-1.009287 50.852968,-1.009311 50.852961,-1.009330 50.852949,-1.009342 50.852934,-1.009347 50.852918,-1.009343 50.852901,-1.009331 50.852886,-1.009312 50.852874,-1.009289 50.852866,-1.009263 50.852863,-1.009236 50.852865,-1.009212 50.852873,-1.009193 50.852885,-1.009181 50.852900,-1.009176 50.852916)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL